oh...Marvelous Designer3... why? I was ready and willing to pay. It is not that I did not like the new colours or the ease and simplicity of the new interface... but really? Did it cost that much to put them in there? So much that you also had to strip the basic version from functions, forcing me to buy the advanced to get the functions I am used to? Oh, I am sorry, did I say buy? I meant "rent", because it is an annual fee. How very "Adobe-esque". Now, the "rent" for one year is 3 times what I paid for MD2, does this mean that MD3 is 3 times better than MD2?... every year? no... not really. Oh, that is right; I can buy a "perpetual" version... for 5 times what I paid for MD2, but then I have to pay $275 for any "major upgrades"... whatever that is... I do not want to be one of those people who complains, and I really want to support MD because it is an amazing and fun program.
...I will continue to use MD2 for a while and think this through...